Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Effect of mechanical drying disruption on the physical and sensory quality of coffee Efecto de la interrupción del secado mecánico en la calidad física y sensorial del café

How to Cite
Pabón, J., & Osorio, V. (2022). Effect of mechanical drying disruption on the physical and sensory quality of coffee. Cenicafe Journal, 73(2), e73201. https://doi.org/10.38141/10778/73201




Keywords
Coffea arabica

secado mecánico

almendra sana

calidad

interrupción

Cenicafé

Colombia

Coffea arabica

mechanical drying

healthy green coffee

quality

interruption

Cenicafé

Colombia

Coffea arabica

secagem

mecânica

grão saudável

qualidade

perturbação

Cenicafé

Colômbia

Sectión
Articles
Jenny Pabón
Valentina Osorio

Summary

Drying is a key stage for the preservation of coffee quality during storage and threshing. Thus, inappropriate practices can have negative impacts on the appearance of the bean and generate sensory defects. The present study evaluated the effect of the interruption of mechanical drying under a 2x4+1 factorial design, with two initial drying times (6 and 12 hours), four interruption times (12, 24, 36 and 48 hours) and a control with mechanical drying without interruption. Intermediate moisture content of parchment coffee was determined for interrupted treatments. On average, when a drying time of 12 hours was used, the moisture content was reduced to 42.29%, with differences of 4.97% and 9.9% with the 6-hour drying treatments and the initial humidity of the washed coffee, respectively. For the healthy green bean variable, an average value of 76.76% was obtained and there were no differences between the treatments. As for the proportion of samples with sensory defect, regardless of the initial drying time, after 36 hours of interruption, the proportion of sensory defects increased. The analysis of variance showed an effect on the sensory quality variables in favor of the non-defect control and had an average score of 81.15. The predominant defect was musty and, according to Dunnett's test, the treatments of shorter initial drying time and longer interruption are different from the control.

Jenny Pabón, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café

Asistente de Investigación, Disciplina de Calidad. Cenicafé


Valentina Osorio, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café

Investigador Científico I, Disciplina de Calidad. Cenicafé


References (See)

  1. Borém, F. M., Isquierdo, E. P., Oliveira, P. D., Ribeiro, F. C., Siqueira, V. C., & Taveira, J. H. (2014). Effect of intermittent drying and storage on parchment coffee quality. Bioscience Journal, 30(2), 609–616. https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/18209
  2. Coradi, P. C., Borém, F. M., Saath, R., & Marques, E. R. (2007). Effect of drying and storage conditions on the quality of natural and washed coffee. Coffee Science, 2(1), 38–47. http://www.coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/37
  3. Corrêa, P. C., Goneli, A. L. D., Júnior, P. C. A., De Oliveira, G. H. H., & Valente, D. S. M. (2010). Moisture sorption isotherms and isosteric heat of sorption of coffee in different processing levels. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 45(10), 2016-2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02373.x
  4. Henao Arismendy, J. (2015). Evaluación del proceso de secado del café y su relación con las propiedades físicas, composición química y calidad en taza [Tesis de Maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/56186
  5. International Organization for Standardization [ISO]. (2003). ISO 6673:2003—Green coffee—Determination of loss in mass at 105 degrees C. https://www.iso.org/standard/38375.html
  6. Isquierdo, E. P., Borém, F. M., Cirillo, M. A., Oliveira, P. D., Cardoso, R. A. & Fortunato, V. A. (2011). Qualidade do café cereja desmucilado submetido ao parcelamento da secagem. Coffee Science, 6(1), 83–90 https://www.coffescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/229
  7. Jurado, J. M., Montoya, E. C., Oliveros, C. E., & García, J. (2009). Método para medir el contenido de humedad del café pergamino en el secado solar del café. Revista Cenicafé, 60(2), 135–147. https://biblioteca.cenicafe.org/handle/10778/188
  8. Kleinwächter, M., Bytof, G., & Selmar, D. (2015). Coffee Beans and Processing. En V. R. Preedy (Ed.), Coffee in Health and Disease Prevention (pp. 73–81). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409517-5.00009-7
  9. Marques, E. R., Borém, F. M., Pereira, R. G. F. A., & Biaggioni, M. A. M. (2008). Eficácia do teste de acidez graxa na avaliação da qualidade do café Arábica (Coffea arabica L.) submetido a diferente períodos e temperaturas de secagem. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 32(5), 1557–1562. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542008000500030
  10. Oliveros, C. E., Pabon, J. P., & Montoya, E. C. (2016). Evaluación de una alternativa para la conservación de la calidad en la comercialización del café húmedo. Revista Cenicafé, 67(2), 86–95. https://biblioteca.cenicafe.org/handle/10778/732
  11. Osorio, V. (2021). La calidad del Café. En Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café, Guía más agronomía, más productividad, más calidad (3a ed., pp. 219–234). Cenicafé. https://doi.org/10.38141/10791/0014_12
  12. Pabón, J., & Osorio, V. (2019). Factores e indicadores de la calidad física, sensorial y química del café. En Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café (Ed.), Aplicación de ciencia tecnología e innovación en el cultivo del café ajustado a las condiciones particulares del Huila (pp. 162–187). Cenicafé. https://doi.org/10.38141/10791/0005_7
  13. Pardo, E., Marín, S., Ramos, A. J., & Sanchis, V. (2005). Effect of Water Activity and Temperature on Mycelial Growth and Ochratoxin A Production by Isolates of Aspergillus ochraceus on Irradiated Green Coffee Beans. Journal of Food Protection, 68(1), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-68.1.133
  14. Parra, A., Roa, G., & Oliveros, C. E. (2008). SECAFÉ Parte I: modelamiento y simulación matemática en el secado mecánico de café pergamino. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 12(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662008000400013
  15. Parra, A., Roa, G., Oliveros, C. E., & Sanz, J. R. (2017). Optimización operacional de secadores mecánicos para café pergamino. Cenicafé. https://www.cenicafe.org/es/publications/librosecado.pdf
  16. Pereira, G. V., Neto, D. P., Júnior, A. I. M., Vásquez, Z. S., Medeiros, A. B. P., Vandenberghe, L. P. S., & Soccol, C. R. (2019). Exploring the impacts of postharvest processing on the aroma formation of coffee beans – A review. Food Chemistry, 272, 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.061
  17. Puerta, G. I. (2013). Calidad del café. En Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia, Manual del cafetero colombiano: Investigación y tecnología para la sostenibilidad de la caficultura (Vol. 3, pp. 81–110). Cenicafé. https://doi.org/10.38141/cenbook-0026_30
  18. Roa, G., Oliveros, C., Parra, A., & Ramírez, C. A. (2000). El secado mecánico del café. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé, 282, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.38141/10779/0282
  19. Roa, G., Oliveros, C. E., Álvarez, J., Ramírez, C. A., Sanz, J. R., Álvarez, J. R., Dávila, M. T., Zambrano, D. A., Puerta, G. I., & Rodríguez, N. (1999). Beneficio ecológico del café. Cenicafé. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/882

Most read articles by the same author(s)