Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Effect of mixtures and genotype area unit on the progressive increase of Hemileia vastatrix Berk. y Br. Efecto de mezclas y unidad del área del genotipo sobre el incremento progresivo de Hemileia vastatrix Berk. y Br.

How to Cite
Arias, J. C. (2019). Effect of mixtures and genotype area unit on the progressive increase of Hemileia vastatrix Berk. y Br. Cenicafe Journal, 70(2), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.38141/10778/70203




Keywords
Coffea arabica

cultivar compuesto

resistencia a enfermedades

pérdida resistencia

diversidad genética

Coffea arabica

multiline cultivar

disease resistance

resistance breakdown

genetic diversity

Coffea arabica

cultivar multilinha

esistência a doenças

quebra de resistência

diversidade genética

Sectión
Articles
Juan Carlos Arias

Summary

The durability of resistance to a disease of high economic impact such as coffee rust (H.vastatrix) is a key element for the sustainability of Coffea arabica L. To achieve it, genetic diversity was proposed as a strategy. The objective of this research was to validate, using evaluations between 1995 and 2017 in two populations, the effect of mixtures and genotype area unit (GAU) on the progress of H.vastatrix in derivatives of Caturra x Timor Hybrid 1343/I.574. Population one (P1) was formed by a diverse mixture of genotypes randomly established in 1977, vs. population two (P2) established in 1991, formed by a mixture of genotypes arranged in furrows of four plants. The results obtained indicate a rapid presence of races compatible with all genotypes, which increased their level over time. However, in P1 it stabilized in the lower and middle strata of the tree, while in P2 it continued its advance until it affected all strata. The Wilcoxon rank sum test showed highly significant differences (p=0.001) in 55% of the evaluations performed, where highly favorable periods for the disease temporarily reduced the effect of the mixture of genotypes. The observations confirm the stabilizing effect of this strategy and the unfavorable implications when GAU is high. These are in agreement with those recorded in commercial fields and it is expected that the chosen strategy will allow a lasting resistance, given the current increase in Colombia of the area cultivated with these varieties.

Juan Carlos Arias, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café

Asistente de investigación. Disciplina de Mejoramiento Genético, Cenicafé.


References (See)

  1. Akanda, I. & Mundt, C. C. (1996). Effects of two component wheat cultivar misxtures os stripe rust severity. Phytopathology, 86(4), 347-353.
  2. Alvarado, A. G., & Moreno, L. G. (2005). Cambio de la virulencia de Hemileia vastatrix en progenies de Caturra X Híbrido de Timor. Revista Cenicafé, 56(2), 110-126.
  3. Alvarado, A.G., Posada H.E. & Cortina, H.A. (2005). Castillo: Nueva variedad de café con resistencia a la roya. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé, 337, 1-8. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/10778/401
  4. Alvarado, A. G., & Cortina, H. A. (1997). Comportamiento agronómico de progenies de híbridos triploides de C. arabica var. Caturra x (Caturra x C. canephora). Revista Cenicafé, 48(2), 73-91.
  5. Brophy, L. S., & Mundt, C. C. (1991). Influence of plant spacial patterns on disease dynamics, plant competition and grain yield in genetically diverse wheat populations. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 35, 1-12.
  6. Browning, J. A. & Frey, K. J. (1969). Multiline cultivars as a means of disease control. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 7, 355-382.
  7. Burdon, J. J., Barret, L. G., Rebetzke, G. & Thrall, P. H. (2014). Guiding deployment of resistance in cereals using evolutionary principles. Evolutionary Applications, 7, 609-624.
  8. Castillo, J. & Leguizamón, C. J. (1992). Virulencia de Hemileia vastatrix determinada por medio de plantas diferenciales de café en Colombia. Revista Cenicafé, 43(4), 114-124.
  9. Castillo, J., & Moreno, L. G. (1988). La variedad Colombia: Selección de un cultivar compuesto resistente a la roya del cafeto. Manizales: Cenicafé.
  10. Cortina, H. A., Moncada, M. P. & Herrera, J.C. (2012). VARIEDAD CASTILLO® Preguntas frecuentes. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé, 426, 1-12 Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/10778/410
  11. Cristancho, M. A., Rozo, Y., Escobar, C., Rivillas, C. A. & Gaitán, A. L. (2012). Razas de roya: epidemias de 2008 a 2011. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé, 425, 1-8. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/10778/353
  12. Cristancho, M. A., Escobar, C., & Ocampo, J. D. (2007). Evolución de razas de Hemileia vastatrix en Colombia. Revista Cenicafé, 58(4), 340-359.
  13. Didelot, F., Brun, L. & Parisi, L. (2007). Effects of cultivar mixtures on scab control in apple orchards. Plant Pathology, 56, 1014-1022.
  14. Eskes, A. B. (1989). Resistance. En: Kushallapa, A. & Eskes, A. B. (Eds.), Coffee rust: epidemiology, resistance, and management. (pp.171-291). Boca Ratón, Florida: CRC Press.
  15. Eskes, A. B.,& Toma-Braghini, M. (1981). Métodos de evaluación de la resistencia contra la roya del cafeto (Hemileia vastatrix Berk. et Br.). Boletín Fitosanitario FAO, Italia 29(3-4), 56 – 66.
  16. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia–FNC. (2018). Sistema de información cafetera – SICA. Santafé
  17. de Bogotá, Colombia: Federacafé.
  18. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia–FNC. (1997). Sistema de Información Cafetera. Encuesta
  19. Nacional Cafetera. Informe Final. Santafé de Bogotá, Colombia: Federacafé.
  20. Flórez., C. P., Arias, J. C., Maldonado, C. E., Cortina, H. A., Moncada, M. P., Quiroga, J., Molina, D. M., García, J. C. & Duque, H. (2018). Variedades Castillo® Zonales resistencia a la roya con mayor productividad. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé, 489, 1-8.
  21. Garret, K. A. & Mundt, C. C. (1999). Epidemiology in mixed host populations. Phytopathology, 8(11), 984-990.
  22. Gil., L. F. (2003). Roya anaranjada Hemileia vastatrix Berk. y Br. En: L. F. Gil., B. L. Castro., & G. Cadena. (Eds.), Enfermedades del cafeto en Colombia. (pp. 149 – 163). Manizales, Colombia: Cenicafé.
  23. Gil, L. F., & Ocampo, J. D. (1998). Identificación de la raza XXII (V5-6) de Hemileia vastatrix en Colombia. Revista Cenicafé, 49(4), 340-344.
  24. Jaramillo, A. (2018). El clima de la caficultura en Colombia. Manizales, Colombia: Cenicafé
  25. Johnson, R. (1984). A critical analysis of durable resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytophatol, 22, 309-330.
  26. Koizumi, S. (2001). Rice blast control with multilines in Japan. En: Mew, T. W., Borromeo, E. & Hardy, B. (Eds.), Exploting biodiversity for sustainable pest management: Proceedings of the Impact Symposium on Exploiting Biodiversity for Sustainable Pest Management 21- 23 August 2000, Kunming, China. (pp. 143 – 157). Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
  27. Leguizamón, J., Baeza, C. A., Fernández, O., Moreno, L. G., Castillo, J., & Orozco, F. J. (1984). Identificación de la raza II de Hemileia vastatrix Berk. y Br. en Colombia. Revista Cenicafé, 35(1), 26-28.
  28. Moreno, L. G. (2002). Nueva variedad de café de porte alto resistente a la roya del cafeto. Revista Cenicafé, 53(2), 132-143.
  29. Moreno, L. G., & Alvarado, G. (2000). La variedad Colombia; veinte años de adopción y comportamiento frente a nuevas razas de la roya del cafeto. Manizales, Colombia: Cenicafé.
  30. Mundt, C. C. (2018). Pyramiding for resistance durability: theory and practice. Phytopathology, 108(7), 792- 802.
  31. Mundt, C. C. (2002). Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mistures for disease management. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol, 40, 381-410.
  32. Mundt, C. C. (2001). Varietal diversification and disease management. En: Mew, T. W., Borromeo, E. & Hardy, B. (Eds.), Exploiting biodiversity for sustainable pest management. Proceedings of the Impact Symposium on Exploiting Biodiversity for Sustainable Pest Management, 21-23 August 2000, Kunming, China. (pp.135-142). Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
  33. Mundt, C. C. & Leonard, K. J. (1986). Analisys of factors affecting disease increase and spread in mixtures of inmune and susceptible plants in computer – simulated epidemics. Phytopathology, 76(8), 832-840.
  34. Mundt, C. C. & Leonard, K. J. (1985). Effect of host genotype unit area on epidemic development of crow rust following focal and general inoculations of mixtures of inmune and susceptible oat plants. Phytopathology, 75(10), 1141-1145.
  35. Ngugi, H. K., King, S. B., Holt, J. & Julian, A. M. (2001). Simultaneous temporal progress of sorghum anthracnose and leaf blight in crop mixtures with disparate patterns. Phytopathology, 91(8), 720-729.
  36. Rodrigues, C. J., Bettencourt, A. J. & Rijo, L. (1975). Races of the pathogen and resistance to coffee rust. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol, 13, 49-70.
  37. Rozo, Y., Escobar, C., Gaitán, A. & Cristancho, M. (2012). Agressiveness and genetic diversity of Hemileia vastatrix during an epidemic in Colombia. Journal of Phytopathology, 160, 732-740.
  38. Rueda G., J. L. (2018). Cambio tecnológico y mejoras en el bienestar de los caficultores en Colombia: el caso de las variedades resistentes a roya. Ensayos sobre economía cafetera, 32(2017-2018), 121-152.
  39. Srinivasan, K. H. & Narasimhaswamy, R. L. (1975). A review of coffee breeding work done at the government coffee experiment station, Balehonnur. Indian Coffee, 39(10 – 11), 311-321.
  40. Wolfe, M. S. (1985). The current status and prospects of multiline cultivars and variety mixtures for disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol, 23 , 251-273.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>