Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Coffee Yield Response To Split Fertilization Producción de café en respuesta al fraccionamiento de la fertilización

How to Cite
González Osorio, H. ., & Sadeghian, S. . (2020). Coffee Yield Response To Split Fertilization. Cenicafe Journal, 71(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.38141/10778/1120




Keywords
Sectión
Articles

Summary

Fertilization is a key practice in coffee production, its effectivity depends on relevance and timing. Consideringthe diversity of soils used to grow coffee in Colombia, the cost of fertilizers and the variations in climaticfactors that affect cultivation, split fertilization is a strategy aimed at increasing productivity. The mainobjective of our study was to evaluate the effect of split fertilization on annual coffee production as theaccumulated of the productive cycle in six localities of the coffee zone (El Agrado-Quindío, El RosarioAntioquia, Naranjal-Caldas, Paraguaicito-Quindío, El Porvenir-Caldas and San Antonio-Santander) that have different climatic and soil characteristics. Fertilizers doses were established according to the recommendations of the soil analysis for each locality and applied split into two, three, four, and six times per year. There was no split effect in five localities, despite the fact that the rainfall exceeded the historical levels of more than 30 years in at least two years of evaluation. At Paraguaicito, whose soil has high hydraulic conductivity, the split fertilization at four and six times per year increased around 12% in production only in one of the four years evaluated. The results show that the supply of the required fertilizer, according to the soil analysis, can be done in two splits per year.

Hernán González Osorio

Investigador Científico I. Disciplina de Suelos, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café, Cenicafé. Chinchiná, Caldas, Colombia.


Siavosh Sadeghian

Investigador Científico III. Disciplina de Suelos, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café, Cenicafé. Chinchiná, Caldas, Colombia


References (See)

  1. Afshar, R., Lin, R., Mohammed, Y. A., & Chen, C. (2018). Agronomic effects of urease and nitrification inhibitors on ammonia volatilization and nitrogen utilization in a dryland farming system: Field and laboratory investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4130 – 4139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.105
  2. Arcila, J. (2007). Crecimiento y desarrollo de la planta de café. En J. Arcila, F. Farfán, A. Moreno, L, Salazar, & E. Hincapie (Eds.), Sistemas de producción de café en Colombia: crecimiento, desarrollo, floración y producción. (1ra ed., pp. 21-60). Cenicafé. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/720
  3. Arias-Suarez, E., & Sadeghian, S. (2018). Lixiviación de potasio en suelos de la zona cafetera y su relación con la textura. Biotecnología en el sector agropecuario y agroindustrial. 16 (1). 34–42. https://doi.org/10.18684/10.18684/bsaa.v16n1.632
  4. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia. (2013). Manual del cafetero colombiano: Investigación y tecnología para la sostenibilidad de la caficultura(Vol. 3). Cenicafé.
  5. Ghiberto, P. J., Libardi, P. L., Brito, A. S., & Trivelin, P. C. O. (2009). Leaching of nutrients from a sugarcane crop growing on an Ultisol in Brazil. Agricultural Water Management, 96(10), 1443-1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.04.020
  6. Georgiadis, P., Taeroe, A., Stupak, I., Kepfer-Rojas, S., Zhang, W., Pinheiro-Bastos, R., & Raulund-Rasmussen, K. (2017). Fertilization effects on biomass production, nutrient leaching and budgets in four stand development stages of short rotation forest poplar. Forest Ecology
  7. and Management, 397, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.04.020
  8. González, H., & Sadeghian, S. (2012). Lixiviación de nitrógeno en suelos de la zona cafetera a partir de diferentes fuentes fertilizantes. Revista Cenicafé, 63(1), 111-119. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/516
  9. González, H., Sadeghian, S., & Jaramillo, A. (2014). Épocas recomendables para la fertilización de cafetales. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé, 442, 1-12. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/498
  10. González, H., Sadeghian, S., Castro, A. F., & Medina, R. D. (2015). Alternativas para disminuir la volatilización de nitrógeno producida por la fertilización con urea. Revista Cenicafé, 66(1), 7-16. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/604
  11. Hansen, E. M., & Eriksen, J. (2016). Nitrate leaching in maize after cultivation of differently managed grassclover leys on coarse sand in Denmark. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 216, 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.010
  12. Ierna, A., & Mauromicale, G. (2018). Potato growth, yield and water productivity response to different irrigation and fertilization regimes. Agricultural Water Management, 201, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.01.008
  13. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y estudios Ambientales – IDEAM. (2011). El fenómeno de “La Niña” presenta su etapa de madurez; algunos modelos y análisis realizados por el IDEAM indican una Niña fuerte. Boletín Informativo, 22. 1-7.
  14. Liu, S., Wang, J. J., Tian, Z., Wang, X., & Harrison, S. (2017). Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical wheat field under different nitrogen fertilization strategies. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 57, 196-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.02.014
  15. Lu, J., Bai, Z., Velthof, G.L., Wu, Z., Chadwick, D., & Ma, L. (2019). Accumulation and leaching of nitrate in soils in wheat-maize production in China. Agricultural Water Management, 212, 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.08.039
  16. Maresca, A., Krüger, O., Herzel, H., Adam, C., Kalbe, U., & Astrup, T. F. (2019). Influence of wood ash pretreatment on leaching behaviour, liming and fertilising potential. Waste Management, 83, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.003
  17. McArthur, J. W., & McCord, G. C. (2017). Fertilizing growth: Agricultural inputs and their effects in economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 127,133–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.02.007
  18. Merigueti, V., Pereira, I., Lier, Q., Dourado-Neto, D., & Reichard, K. (2017). Environmental benefits of reducing N rates for coffee in the Cerrado. Soil & Tillage Research, 166, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.10.006
  19. Mestre, A., & Uribe, A. (1980). Dosis y frecuencia de aplicación del fertilizante en la producción de café. Revista Cenicafé, 31(4), 145-163. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/684
  20. Niemiec, M., Cupia?, M., & Szel?g-Sikora, A. (2015). Efficiency of celeriac fertilization with phosphorus and potassium under conditions of integrated plant production. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 7, 184-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.015
  21. Sadeghian, S., Hernández, E., & González, H. (2007). Mezcla de fertilizantes en la finca, una buena opción para el caficultor. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé, 362, 1-8. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/363
  22. Sadeghian, S. (2008). Fertilidad del suelo y nutrición del café en Colombia: Guía Práctica. Boletín Técnico Cenicafé 32, 1-43. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/587
  23. Sadeghian, S., & González, H. (2012). Alternativas generales de fertilización para cafetales en la etapa de producción.Avances Técnicos Cenicafé, 424, 1-8. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/1107
  24. Sadeghian, S., Mejía, B., & González, H. (2013). Acumulación de calcio magnesio y azufre en los frutos de café. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé, 430, 1-8. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/408
  25. Sadeghian, S., González, H., & Arias, E. (2015). Lixiviación de nutrientes en suelos de la zona cafetera: Prácticas que ayudan a reducirla. Boletín Técnico Cenicafé, 40, 1-34. http://hdl.handle.net/10778/1110
  26. Sowi?ski J., & G??b, L. (2018). The effect of nitrogen fertilization management on yield and nitrate contents in sorghum biomass and bagasse. Field Crops Research, 227, 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.08.006
  27. Tian, X., Li, C., Zhang, M., Li, T., Lu, Y., & Liu, L. (2018). Controlled release urea improved crop yields and mitigated nitrate leaching under cotton-garlic intercropping system in a 4-year field trial. Soil and Tillage Research, 175, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.08.015
  28. Tully, K. L., Lawrence, D., & Scanlon, T. M. (2012). More trees less loss: Nitrogen leaching losses decrease with increasing biomass in coffee agroforests. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 161, 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.08.002